12 Comments

Cool...

Expand full comment
Sep 4Liked by Kerry Jane

Life path number 9. :)

Expand full comment
author

Well hello there! I think I just saw you on my channel, and it's a delight to see you here too! Thank you for being here! And ah, the 9. The reliable one everyone counts on, perhaps too much. A considerable evolution. Good luck to you on your journey 🫡.

Expand full comment

Life path 2 here. I look forward to learning more about this!

Expand full comment
author

Ah, yes. The Mediator. Diplomacy, love, and emotions. How this story begins. I just updated this post with the table of contents. Thank you for taking the time to check it out!

Expand full comment

It's interesting that you reduce it to a single digit - I know that's possible of course but I also learned (this was about thirty years or so ago) about only reducing it to a double digit (which can also be related to a tarot card). So me for example would be 10+2+(1+9+7+3=20)=32. So you then read it as the second number acting (or manifesting) through the first - so in my case that's the 2 acting through the 3 (endless need for growth, or the need to make the stable 2 principle have some practical utility to make the world a better place - which ties in with my Sagittarius ascendant - although different people would read it differently perhaps). In the tarot, however, 32 is the six of wands - even numbers being stable, odd numbers being movement. In other words you can get lots of different meanings out of the single result. And weirdly enough, I have never thought of myself as a 5! So now you've just given me something entirely new to think about...

Expand full comment
author

Yes, to me it's important to keep in mind how one got to the number, but to get to the root of the person or thing, I always reduce to one number. If there are a bunch of repeating numbers everywhere, I mention it and what it could mean. If you're perceiving a reading through the hero's journey, keeping the 2 digits might be necessary in deciphering the precise steps of that journey and all the nuisance involved in that. In my practice, I'm taking the data from their entry to earth and getting to the heart of it to offer clues as to why they incarnated, or what for. Hello fellow 5 LP! Not reducing the number sparks a lot of debate. For example, my date is 1/26/1994. Here's the following addition combinations that could imply: (1+26+1+9+9+4)=50/(1+2+6+1+9+9+4)=32/(1+26+1994)=2,021. How does one determine which grouping is correct? Which numbers should be grouped together, and which shouldn't? It doesn't matter when they're fundamentally the same, which is 5.

Expand full comment

Hello fellow Aquarius as well!

I know what you mean about the different addition combinations. Because of my tarot influence (which came first) I would reduce them to double digits, look at the 2nd through the 1st, but then reduce to the single digit. So that's three steps. I read your other comment about how you read the birthdate though and that makes a lot of sense in a similar way - so mine would be 1 (10) - 3 - 5 (ah - there's another thing - I'm English so we write our day/month the other way round!). So for the birthdate I'd use the first addition combination you mentioned. 50 is the ten of cups, by the way.

I think maybe it's a case of find a method that clearly works and stick to it!

Expand full comment

I’m a life path 1! Excited to see what you will write for it in the near future! Excited to dive in and read these stories!

Expand full comment
author

Oooooo that is exciting because that's the life path that I will be working on next! I'm a 5 and the 1-5-7 group are all natural matches to one another. Hello comrade 👋, and thank you for begin here.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author
Aug 13, 2023·edited Aug 13, 2023Author

There are many resources for numerology online that could provide you with some insight. Here is my two cents on the 2 Life Path if numerology is something you're interested in.

https://youtu.be/O61LJUrI9OI

Expand full comment
author

You are correct

Expand full comment